Sunday, December 23, 2007

The Army Values Support IVAW

A lot of people question how I can be a sergeant in the Army, giving my oath true weight, and believing in its values, and still be a member of IVAW.

It's easy. I believe in the Army's purpose-it is to defend our country and protect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I don't think its purpose is foreign wars we can't win. Its true purpose is noble, and has been subverted by armchair soldiers, politicians who have never had to serve. They don't know these values, and they don't live them-but I do. And here's why they support, rather than contradict, what I'm doing now as a member of IVAW.

Loyalty: Bear true faith and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, the Army, your unit, and fellow soldiers.

Nowhere in this list does it say "the current leadership of your country, and their political decisions". I am loyal to my fellow soldiers; I do not want them to die in a purposeless war. I am loyal to the Army; I do not want it to be weakened on multiple fronts and taken away from its true purpose, defense of the nation. I am loyal to the Constitution; a Constitution which is under attack by men who have not sacrificed to protect it. I bear true faith and allegiance to these, most particularly the Constitution which founded our nation.

Duty: Fulfill your obligations

Our highest obligations as soldiers is our obligation to our country and the flag we salute. Our obligation as citizens and patriots compels us to defend our country in any way we can-against its destruction as well as its dishonor. The Iraq War, and the way it is being prosecuted, dishonors us in the eyes of the world, and even worse, dishonors us to ourselves.

Respect: Treat people as they should be treated.

Treat the people of the United States as well as the people of Iraq with respect. They deserve to be treated according to their status: if they are prisoners of war, then treat them with the full dignity accorded POWs. If they are criminals, then give them trials. Innocent until proven guilty: we do not lose our values when we step away from our shores.

Selfless Service: Put the welfare of the Nation, the Army, and your subordinates before your own.

Being a member of IVAW is hard. It is hard to stand up, to devote effort and time to an organization committed to what is right, when your leadership so firmly believes that it is wrong. It's hard to face the intimidation and harassment that many members of the active duty military face when they begin to speak out on what they feel. It's hard to stand up and tell your higher ups that they are committing crimes. But the welfare of the Nation, our continued survival as an honorable country, and the continued survival of the Army depends on some of us standing up, and saying, "Sir, no Sir!" That we will not participate in illegal acts, and we will report them when and where we see them. We will not train our soldiers to commit them, and will train our soldiers to follow the honorable path. And the honorable path now, the hard service, means standing up and speaking the truth, so that legislators can begin to realize it, and bring us home.

Honor: Live up to Army Values

Honor is living up to all the Army Values, but it is even older than that. It is the thing you have when you have nothing else left. It is all you need: it should be the cornerstone of a soldier. It is phrased as living up to all the Army Values, because if you lack even one, you cannot be an honorable soldier. It is the ability to look yourself in the mirror at the end of the day and know you have done all that you can, and that you have not had to reproach yourself for anything.

Our leadership is currently dishonorable. By their bending of the torture legislation to allow what they want to take place, they are attempting to put a stain upon our honor that will take at least a generation to erase. As soon as our soldiers have fulfilled their usefulness to them, leadership shuffles them away, with "personality disorders" instead of PTSD treatment. Benefits are cut, while contractors reach huge rewards. This is not taking care of the people who have given their all to the country. It is dishonorable, and the only way to restore that honor is to stand up against the people who are doing so and will do so again.

Integrity: Do what is right, legally and morally.

The things that the political leadership of this country are trying to do right now are neither legal nor moral. The acceptance of torture, the belief that once Americans go beyond their borders, they no longer have to hold to the beliefs that shaped our nation, 'baiting' with weapons caches, and other such tactics at the very least skirt the fine line of legality: they are definitely not moral. Claiming that it is okay to treat people dishonorably because they are not an organized force fighting against us is simply wrong, as is the argument that they are not citizens and therefore do not deserve the protections of the Constitution. We are the good guys! We do the right thing, even if others don't, and if our leadership does not understand that, it needs to. It needs to pull out of this war, and cease its immoral actions, to bring itself in line with the country's beliefs and principles.

Personal Courage: Face fear, danger, or adversity (physical or moral)

It does not take physical courage to stand up and fight against injustice in this fashion. Most members have not been physically attacked-the cowards who attack people for their beliefs have gone after a father of a dead servicemember instead (Carlos Arredondo). But it does take moral courage. It takes moral courage to stand up for what you know to be true and right, moral courage to say that the country is steering in the wrong direction, and you are committed by your oath to turn it around. It takes moral courage to resist a war that your leadership believes in, or to stand against your entire platoon and state that you will not treat a prisoner with anything less than full dignity. And it takes moral courage to be counted, here, to let people insult you for perceived cowardice, when the truth is that you, like I, may not be against all wars, all places, all times.

But hopefully you, like I, like many committed and dedicated members of the military community, are against this one.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just a few comments in response to some of yours:

Your quote: "Our leadership is currently dishonorable. By their bending of the torture legislation to allow what they want to take place, they are attempting to put a stain upon our honor that will take at least a generation to erase."

I raise the bullshit flag on this one. Every miscreant in GITMO earned their way there. They were captured after firefights and arrested as part of counter-terrorist operations. The Left pisses and moans and complains incessantly about the measures we have to take in order to extract information that will save American lives. I’m supposed to lose sleep over that?

Your quote: "As soon as our soldiers have fulfilled their usefulness to them, leadership shuffles them away, with "personality disorders" instead of PTSD treatment. Benefits are cut, while contractors reach huge rewards. This is not taking care of the people who have given their all to the country. It is dishonorable, and the only way to restore that honor is to stand up against the people who are doing so and will do so again."

The government (or the country for that matter) has NEVER gone the same distance as a veteran's dedication and sacrifice. As far as PTSD, that happens in every war. The VA is understaffed and overworked. They can't fix everything but they do the best they can. Does it need an overhaul? You bet. I dunno 'bout you, but I write legislators, news papers,VFW and American Legion reps frequently. They know what needs to be done. It's up to us to make sure they do it.

"The things that the political leadership of this country are trying to do right now are neither legal nor moral. The acceptance of torture, the belief that once Americans go beyond their borders, they no longer have to hold to the beliefs that shaped our nation, 'baiting' with weapons caches, and other such tactics at the very least skirt the fine line of legality: they are definitely not moral. Claiming that it is okay to treat people dishonorably because they are not an organized force fighting against us is simply wrong, as is the argument that they are not citizens and therefore do not deserve the protections of the Constitution. We are the good guys! We do the right thing, even if others don't, and if our leadership does not understand that, it needs to. It needs to pull out of this war, and cease its immoral actions, to bring itself in line with the country's beliefs and principles."

Let me be the first to inform you that the Al Qaeda, Taliban, and every other terrorist scumbag, won't play by the Marquis of Queensberry rules. Forget bout your John Wayne ideas of warfare. They don't apply here. I'm all for baiting with weapons caches. It's an excellent tactic to draw the little assholes out from under their rocks so they can be killed.
Now, I know this is sure to give you an aneurism, but this is what I would have done on 12 September 2001:
Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan (for starters) would have been leveled into asphalt parking lots. THAT is how you fight a jihad. The goal of Islamofascism is a world-wide Caliphate. After victory is acheived in Iraq and Afghanistan, this still won't be over by a long shot. And it won't be until all of them are dead or finally decide to worship their "Allah" in peace. As for me, I predict the former.
SFC Cheryl McElroy
US ARMY (RET)

Army Sergeant said...

SFC McElroy:

I'm a little concerned about how many people have been released from there (Gitmo and others like it), honestly. If so many have been released after so long, how can we be sure that they were guilty in the first place? A couple people have even been released with apologies. It's a dangerous precedent to set.

Maybe the government has never gone the distance. It seems from this perspective that it has-WWII GI Bill was awesome, for example, but then I don't think they really had the same PTSD awareness right now. I'm not blaming the government for causing the PTSD, it's just that I have the attitude of, "You broke it, you bought it". If somebody's service caused them a problem, they should be taken care of. I do constantly try to agitate for better treatment for veterans, and less consideration of the 'financial' equation in whether or not our veterans will get care. But it does bother me that the current government doesn't seem to see that as a priority.

I'm not going to have an aneurism, because you're not the only person I know who's said they want to turn the Middle East to glass. I just don't think launching nukes are ever a good thing with how many nukes are out there today. Plus, the fallout would be incredible. Sometimes I understand how it's tempting, though-the Middle East hasn't been fixed for thousands of years and in my eyes is unlikely to be fixed now.

Anonymous said...

YOU are a lyin'sack of SHIT!!!

Anonymous said...

YEAH--NUKE 'EM and get ready for a real-life ON THE BEACH scenario. Sarge McElroy, do you think all that radiation would just stay in the Middle East? Soon, we'd ALL get a Gov't-Issue Reverend Jones (cyanide cocktail) to drink. LOVELY!! Methinks the last true military victory was 8/45. THE WHOLE BALL GAME HAS CHANGED NOW!!